What counts as evidence?
Our initial sources are official pricing pages, terms, privacy notices and help articles. These document what a provider says. They do not prove response quality, security, reliability or the effectiveness of a deletion request. Each factual record carries sources, a check date and an evidence status.
Where official pages disagree, we report the conflict. Where a feature is not confirmed, we say that instead of treating it as absent. Hands-on labels will require an actual documented test with a date, plan, device and repeatable procedure.
How do we compare costs?
We separate monthly payment from annual monthly equivalent, identify currency and any observed tax caveat, and distinguish access fees from credits or add-ons. We do not compare a promotional annual price with an ordinary monthly subscription as if the commitment were the same.
A useful cost comparison includes the allowance and per-action tariff when available. If either is missing, we cannot honestly calculate a typical monthly usage bill. We will not fill the gap with an invented average.
What do the five flames mean?
The flames are labelled Match fit. They show the proportion of your selected features documented in a provider’s sources, with the exact count beside them. Five lit flames mean all your selected features are documented. A partial flame shows a partial unit: three documented features out of four fill three and three-quarter flames. No selected features means no meter.
This is not a five-star review, a measure of sexual intensity or a guarantee of quality, safety, privacy or enjoyment. A dim flame can reflect missing documentation rather than an unavailable feature. Open the provider’s review to inspect its sources and limitations.
The default directory is a browsing list, not a league table. Match results use selected documented features; commission rates are not an input. Source-based strengths and drawbacks remain editorial judgments rather than measured product performance.
How do corrections work?
Material changes should update the central provider record, affected review and comparison sections, and source history together. A new check date requires a real check. An old source is not quietly relabeled as fresh.
Our monitored correction contact is not configured yet. Public launch is blocked until a real contact and accountable publisher details are in place.